Requests for Admission in Injury Cases | GoSuits

• What are requests for admission and how do they work in personal injury discovery?
• Why do requests for admission matter in civil litigation and settlement?
• How are Rule 36 requests for admission used in federal court?
• How do Texas Rule 198 requests for admission work?
• How do California requests for admission work under CCP 2033?
• How do Illinois Supreme Court Rule 216 requests for admission work?
• What are practical examples of requests for admission in injury cases?
• How should you respond to requests for admission?
• What happens if you miss the deadline or fail to admit?
• Can admissions be withdrawn or amended later?
• How many requests for admission can a party serve?
• How do courts handle improper requests or objections to RFAs?
• How are admissions used at summary judgment and trial?
• What practical strategies help plaintiffs and defendants with RFAs?
• How do RFAs interact with other discovery tools in personal injury cases?
• What should you know about RFAs in Houston, Dallas, Austin, San Antonio, Los Angeles, San Diego, San Francisco, and Chicago?
• When should you get legal help for RFAs in civil cases?
• How can GoSuits help you with RFAs and discovery in injury cases?
• Sources and further reading

What are requests for admission and how do they work in personal injury discovery?

Requests for admission, often called RFAs, are written statements one side serves on the other in civil litigation asking the recipient to admit or deny specific facts, admit the application of law to facts, or admit the authenticity of documents. In personal injury discovery, RFAs narrow the issues for trial and help authenticate records like medical bills, photographs, and repair invoices. RFAs are governed by formal rules in each court system: Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 36 for federal cases, Texas Rule of Civil Procedure 198, California Code of Civil Procedure sections 2033.010 through 2033.420, and Illinois Supreme Court Rule 216. If an RFA is not answered on time, it can be deemed admitted, which can have powerful consequences at summary judgment and at trial.

Legally, an admission is binding in that case unless withdrawn by court order. An RFA answer must fairly meet the substance of the request, and if a party cannot truthfully admit or deny, the rules require a reasonable inquiry and a qualified response rather than silence. See Federal Rule 36(a)(1) and (a)(4) for the core framework (law.cornell.edu).

Why do requests for admission matter in civil litigation and settlement?

RFAs can streamline your case by locking down undisputed facts, avoiding needless proof at trial, and spotlighting the real disputes. Because they can be deemed admitted if not timely answered, RFAs are also a deadline-sensitive tool that can shift leverage. Courts encourage litigants to use discovery to narrow issues because only a small fraction of civil cases reach trial. In federal court, bench and jury trials occur in a very small percentage of civil filings each year (uscourts.gov). In large state courts, only a small percentage of civil cases are resolved by trial, with most ending through settlement, dismissal, or other rulings, a trend documented by the Bureau of Justice Statistics (bjs.ojp.gov). Because resolution often turns on motion practice and negotiated outcomes, well-crafted admissions can help obtain favorable rulings or prompt settlement by clarifying what must be proven.

How are Rule 36 requests for admission used in federal court?

In federal court, Rule 36 allows a party to serve RFAs about facts, the application of law to fact, opinions about either, and the genuineness of documents. Key features include:

• Scope: RFAs may address facts and the application of law to facts. Objections that a request calls for a pure legal conclusion can have merit, but requests applying law to the case facts are allowed under Rule 36(a)(1)(A) (law.cornell.edu).
• Timing: The responding party has 30 days to answer unless the court sets a different time or the parties stipulate. If served with the complaint, the court may allow more time. See Rule 36(a)(3) (law.cornell.edu).
• Form of response: Each matter must be admitted, denied, or the reasons must be stated for inability to admit or deny after reasonable inquiry. Partial admissions require qualification. See Rule 36(a)(4) (law.cornell.edu).
• Effect of admission: Admitted matters are conclusively established for the case unless the court permits withdrawal or amendment under Rule 36(b). Admissions cannot be used against the party in another case. See Rule 36(b) (law.cornell.edu).
• Failure to admit sanctions: If a party fails to admit and the requesting party later proves the matter, the court must order payment of reasonable expenses including attorney’s fees unless listed exceptions apply. See Rule 37(c)(2) (law.cornell.edu).
• Certification: Discovery responses are subject to Rule 26(g) certification by counsel, requiring a reasonable inquiry and proportionality to the case. Improper responses can trigger sanctions. See Rule 26(g) (law.cornell.edu).

How do Texas Rule 198 requests for admission work?

Texas Rule of Civil Procedure 198 governs RFAs in Texas courts. Highlights include:

• Scope: Parties may request admissions on any matter within the scope of discovery, including statements of opinion or fact or the application of law to fact, and the genuineness of documents. See TRCP 198.1 (txcourts.gov).
• Deadline to respond: A written response is due within 30 days, or 50 days if the RFAs were served with the initial petition. See TRCP 198.2(a) (txcourts.gov).
• Form of answer: The responding party must admit or deny, or explain in detail why they cannot admit or deny. A party may qualify an answer when appropriate. See TRCP 198.2(b) (txcourts.gov).
• Deemed admissions: Failure to timely respond results in deemed admissions by operation of law. See TRCP 198.2(c) (txcourts.gov).
• Withdrawal of deemed admissions: A party may move to withdraw deemed admissions by showing good cause and that the other party is not unduly prejudiced. See TRCP 198.3 (txcourts.gov).
• Failure to admit sanctions: If a party fails to admit and the requesting party later proves the matter, the court may order payment of reasonable expenses, including attorney’s fees. See TRCP 215 addressing discovery sanctions and expenses for refusal to admit (txcourts.gov).
• Protective orders and proportionality: Texas courts may issue protective orders to prevent undue burden or harassment in discovery. See TRCP 192.6 (txcourts.gov).

Because Texas uses discovery control plans, numeric limits and timing can vary by case level. RFAs are commonly used throughout Texas in cities like Houston, Dallas, Austin, and San Antonio to authenticate records and pin down liability or comparative responsibility contentions.

How do California requests for admission work under CCP 2033?

California’s request for admission rules appear in Code of Civil Procedure sections 2033.010 through 2033.420. Key California points include:

• Scope and allowance: RFAs may address the truth of specified matters of fact, opinion relating to fact, or the application of law to fact, and the genuineness of documents. See CCP 2033.010 (leginfo.legislature.ca.gov).
• Numerical limits: There is a limit of 35 RFAs that request admission of the truth of matters, unless accompanied by a declaration of necessity. Requests regarding genuineness of documents are not limited by this 35-request cap. See CCP 2033.030 (leginfo.legislature.ca.gov).
• Deadline to respond: Responses are due 30 days after service, unless extended by agreement or court order. See CCP 2033.250 (leginfo.legislature.ca.gov).
• Verification: Responses must be in writing and signed under oath by the party; objections are signed by the attorney. See CCP 2033.240 (leginfo.legislature.ca.gov).
• Deemed admitted for no response: If no timely response is served, the requesting party may move for an order deeming the RFAs admitted. The court shall grant the motion and may impose monetary sanctions. See CCP 2033.280 (leginfo.legislature.ca.gov).
• Withdrawal and relief: A party may move to withdraw or amend admissions if it would promote the presentation of the merits and does not prejudice the requesting party. See CCP 2033.300 (leginfo.legislature.ca.gov).
• Failure to admit sanctions: If a party unreasonably denies an RFA and the requesting party later proves it, the court must order payment of reasonable expenses of proof unless exceptions apply. See CCP 2033.420 (leginfo.legislature.ca.gov).

California litigators in Los Angeles, San Diego, and San Francisco frequently use RFAs to authenticate voluminous records and to narrow negligence and damages issues. The 35-request cap for truth RFAs encourages targeted drafting or a declaration showing why additional requests are necessary.

How do Illinois Supreme Court Rule 216 requests for admission work?

Illinois Supreme Court Rule 216 governs RFAs in Illinois. Important points include:

• Scope: RFAs may seek admissions of fact, the application of law to fact, and the genuineness of documents. See Rule 216(a) (illinoiscourts.gov).
• Deadline to respond: Responses are due within 28 days unless the court orders otherwise. Unanswered requests are admitted by default. See Rule 216(c) (illinoiscourts.gov).
• Form and effect: Each matter is admitted unless timely denied or objected to. Admissions are for the pending action only. See Rule 216(c) (illinoiscourts.gov).
• Failure to admit expenses: If a party fails to admit and the requesting party proves the matter, the court may require payment of reasonable expenses, including attorney’s fees. See Illinois Supreme Court Rule 219(b) (illinoiscourts.gov).

In Chicago and across Illinois, RFAs often resolve genuine disputes about vehicle ownership, agency, policy limits, and authenticity of records, allowing the parties and court to focus on liability and damages that truly remain in dispute.

REQUEST NOW

What are practical examples of requests for admission in injury cases?

Below are typical examples used in motor-vehicle collisions, unsafe premises, and other injury matters. These are illustrations only. The precise wording must be tailored to your case and jurisdiction:

• Liability facts: Admit you were operating a 2019 pickup on Interstate 10 near downtown Houston at approximately 5:45 p.m. on March 3, 2024.
• Right-of-way or rules of the road: Admit you failed to stop at the red traffic signal at the intersection of Cesar Chavez and Mission Street in San Francisco.
• Ownership and agency: Admit you owned the vehicle involved in the collision and it was being driven with your permission in Dallas.
• Comparative fault: Admit you do not contend that Plaintiff was negligent in any respect that caused the occurrence in San Antonio.
• Mechanism of incident: Admit your vehicle contacted the rear of Plaintiff’s vehicle on the Kennedy Expressway in Chicago.
• Injury causation position: Admit you do not dispute that the incident was a producing cause of Plaintiff’s neck strain.
• Medical bills authenticity: Admit that the attached medical bills from ABC Clinic are true and correct copies kept in the ordinary course of business in Los Angeles.
• Repair invoices: Admit the attached auto repair estimate for Plaintiff’s vehicle is authentic and accurately reflects amounts charged in San Diego.
• Insurance coverage disclosure: Admit that at the time of the collision, you were insured under policy number XXXX with liability limits of $100,000 per person under Federal Rule 26(a)(1)(A)(iv) disclosures.
• Genuineness of photographs: Admit the attached photographs accurately depict the condition of the stairwell at 123 Main Street, Austin, on the date of Plaintiff’s fall.
• Contention narrowing: Admit you do not contend that any non-party caused or contributed to Plaintiff’s injuries in San Francisco.

How should you respond to requests for admission?

Responding well prevents harmful deemed admissions and avoids sanctions:

• Calendar the deadline immediately: Federal cases require a response within 30 days. California requires 30 days, Texas generally 30 days or 50 days if served with the petition, and Illinois 28 days. Confirm your exact deadline under the governing rule.
• Make a reasonable inquiry: You cannot refuse to admit for lack of information without stating a reasonable inquiry was made and the information known or readily obtainable is insufficient. See FRCP 36(a)(4) (law.cornell.edu).
• Admit, deny, or qualify: If part of a statement is true and part is not, qualify your answer to admit what is true and deny the remainder. Avoid argumentative language.
• Use appropriate objections: Object only where allowed, such as for vagueness, ambiguity, overbreadth, privilege, or lack of relevance proportional to the needs of the case. Remember that the application of law to fact is permissible in many jurisdictions.
• Verify where required: In California, responses must be signed under oath by the party. See CCP 2033.240 (leginfo.legislature.ca.gov).
• Serve timely and completely: Untimely or incomplete responses risk deemed admissions or fee-shifting if the matter must be proven at hearing or trial.

Careful handling by a litigation team helps meet these requirements, preserve objections, and prevent avoidable admissions.

What happens if you miss the deadline or fail to admit?

Consequences vary by jurisdiction but are consistently serious:

• Federal court: A matter is admitted if not timely answered or objected to. See FRCP 36(a)(3) (law.cornell.edu). If a party unreasonably denies an RFA and the proponent later proves it, the court must award the costs of proof unless exceptions apply. See FRCP 37(c)(2) (law.cornell.edu).
• Texas: Unanswered RFAs are automatically deemed admitted. See TRCP 198.2(c). Expenses for refusal to admit can be awarded under TRCP 215 (txcourts.gov).
• California: The court shall deem RFAs admitted upon motion when no responses are served and may impose monetary sanctions. See CCP 2033.280. If a matter is denied without justification and later proven, the court shall award the reasonable expenses of proof under CCP 2033.420 (leginfo.legislature.ca.gov).
• Illinois: Unanswered RFAs are admitted by default. Expenses for failure to admit may be awarded under Rule 219(b) (illinoiscourts.gov).

These consequences can be case-dispositive. For example, deemed admissions of fault or causation can support summary judgment.

Can admissions be withdrawn or amended later?

Courts can allow withdrawal or amendment of admissions, but relief is not automatic:

• Federal: The court may permit withdrawal if it would promote presentation of the merits and the requesting party would not be prejudiced. See FRCP 36(b) (law.cornell.edu).
• Texas: A party may move to withdraw deemed admissions by showing good cause and lack of undue prejudice to the requesting party. See TRCP 198.3 (txcourts.gov).
• California: A court may permit withdrawal or amendment if in the interest of justice and without undue prejudice. See CCP 2033.300 (leginfo.legislature.ca.gov).
• Illinois: Withdrawal requires court permission on motion under Rule 216(c), typically considering fairness and prejudice (illinoiscourts.gov).

Because the standards require showing both merit-promotion and lack of prejudice, promptly addressing any lapse is critical.

How many requests for admission can a party serve?

Limits vary by jurisdiction and case type:

• Federal: Rule 36 does not impose a numerical limit on RFAs, but courts manage discovery for proportionality under Rules 26 and 16, and may set limits in scheduling orders (law.cornell.edu).
• California: RFAs directed to the truth of matters are limited to 35 unless accompanied by a declaration of necessity. Requests to admit genuineness of documents are not subject to the limit. See CCP 2033.030 (leginfo.legislature.ca.gov).
• Texas: Texas discovery control plans can affect limits. Some case levels impose numeric limits, while others focus on proportionality. Consult the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure and any court orders for your case (txcourts.gov).
• Illinois: Rule 216 does not specify a fixed number, but courts may limit unreasonable or oppressive requests through protective orders under Illinois rules (illinoiscourts.gov).

How do courts handle improper requests or objections to RFAs?

Court rules allow objections and protective orders, but they must be made in good faith:

• Improper scope or compound requests: Courts may strike or limit RFAs that are compound, vague, argumentative, or disproportionate. Requests seeking privileged information can be objected to.
• Application of law to fact allowed: Objections that a request calls for a legal conclusion are not proper when the request asks for the application of law to fact, which is permitted in federal, Texas, California, and Illinois rules. See FRCP 36(a)(1)(A), TRCP 198.1, CCP 2033.010, and Rule 216(a) (law.cornell.edu, txcourts.gov, leginfo.legislature.ca.gov, illinoiscourts.gov).
• Protective orders: Courts can issue protective orders to prevent harassment, undue burden, or expense. See FRCP 26(c), TRCP 192.6, and California and Illinois discovery rules (law.cornell.edu, txcourts.gov, illinoiscourts.gov).

How are admissions used at summary judgment and trial?

Admissions are powerful because each admitted matter is conclusively established in the case:

• Summary judgment: Admissions often satisfy elements or eliminate defenses, supporting or defeating summary judgment. For example, an admission to the authenticity of business records allows their use without live foundational testimony in federal and state courts.
• Trial: Admissions can be read to the jury, limit witnesses, and streamline exhibits. They remove issues from the jury’s consideration and may reduce trial time substantially. See the conclusive effect provisions of FRCP 36(b) and equivalent state rules.

What practical strategies help plaintiffs and defendants with RFAs?

RFAs should be purposeful and proportional. Consider these approaches:

• Authenticate key documents early: Ask the other side to admit genuineness of medical bills, photos, repair invoices, 911 recordings, and business records.
• Target undisputed facts: Lock down facts like ownership, date, time, location, weather, traffic signals, and points of impact. This is useful across TX, CA, and IL.
• Pin down positions on fault and causation: Ask the other side to admit they are not asserting certain defenses or to specify which facts support a defense.
• Avoid overreaching: Do not flood the other side with marginal RFAs. Overuse can prompt protective orders and undermine credibility.
• Use follow-up strategically: If a denial is equivocal, consider a motion to compel better responses or plan to seek expenses of proof later if you establish the fact at trial. California’s CCP 2033.420 and federal Rule 37(c)(2) are examples of fee-shifting frameworks.
• Coordinate with interrogatories and document requests: Use RFAs to distill positions after you have the evidentiary documents and interrogatory answers.
• Calendar carefully: Track 30-day federal, Texas, and California deadlines and Illinois’s 28-day deadline, plus mailing extensions where applicable under local rules.

How do RFAs interact with other discovery tools in personal injury cases?

RFAs are part of a broader discovery plan:

• Interrogatories: Use interrogatories to obtain narrative facts, then deploy RFAs to have those facts admitted.
• Requests for production: Once you obtain medical records, photographs, and repair bills, use RFAs to authenticate them so you do not need custodians at trial.
• Depositions: Admissions can focus deposition time on disputed issues and strengthen impeachment if a witness contradicts an admission.
• Initial disclosures: Federal cases require initial disclosure of insurance agreements, which may be followed by RFAs to confirm policy numbers and limits. See FRCP 26(a)(1)(A)(iv) (law.cornell.edu).

What should you know about RFAs in Houston, Dallas, Austin, San Antonio, Los Angeles, San Diego, San Francisco, and Chicago?

Local practice matters, even under statewide or federal rules:

• Texas metro courts: In Houston, Dallas, Austin, and San Antonio, standing orders and docket-control orders may modify discovery timelines. Check the court’s website and scheduling order. Texas courts often enforce deemed admissions strictly but allow withdrawal when it serves the merits and does not cause unfair prejudice.
• California urban courts: In Los Angeles, San Diego, and San Francisco, judges frequently expect parties to authenticate documents by stipulation or RFAs to reduce trial time. The 35-request cap for truth RFAs often prompts targeted sets plus a declaration of necessity for more.
• Illinois Cook County: Chicago courts regularly apply Rule 216’s 28-day response period. Protective orders are available if RFAs are cumulative or harassing, and courts may award expenses of proof under Rule 219(b).
• Federal courts in TX, CA, IL: Scheduling orders under Rule 16 may set RFA deadlines. Many judges expect the parties to confer early on admissibility issues, including authenticating records, to streamline trial.

When should you get legal help for RFAs in civil cases?

RFAs carry strict deadlines and consequences that can determine the outcome of a personal injury case. Missing a deadline can lead to deemed admissions. Unreasonable denials can result in fee awards if the other side proves the matter. Because the rules differ across jurisdictions and even among courts within the same city, having a team that knows how to draft, respond, and litigate RFAs can protect your claims or defenses and preserve leverage for negotiation.

A legal team can also evaluate whether to move to withdraw deemed admissions, seek protective orders, or pursue expenses of proof after trial, and can coordinate RFAs with other discovery to position your case for summary judgment or favorable settlement.

How can GoSuits help you with RFAs and discovery in injury cases?

We understand the urgency and stakes when you receive or need to serve requests for admission in litigation. A free consultation with our personal injury team can clarify your deadlines, map out a response plan, and identify the best use of RFAs to advance your case in Texas, California, or Illinois.

REQUEST NOW

What availability and communication do we offer?

• Available 24/7: You can reach us any time for an immediate free consultation. When RFAs arrive, the clock starts. We can evaluate your timeline the same day and begin drafting or reviewing responses.
• Direct access and updates: Our attorneys and staff are available at all locations around the clock. We provide regular case status updates and quick turnaround on time-sensitive discovery tasks.
• Multilingual support: We offer multilingual customer service, with 24/7 Spanish and Farsi speakers available to help you feel comfortable and informed.

What are our fee policies and cost transparency?

• No win, No Attorney Fees: Learn how our contingent fee structure works here: No win, No Attorney Fees.
• No hidden administrative fees: We communicate costs clearly from day one so you understand how expenses are handled throughout discovery and trial.

How do our tools and case workflow help your claim?

• Proprietary personal injury software: We built a secure, in-house system for our team that streamlines investigation, demand preparation, negotiation, filing, and discovery. With RFAs, our system tracks deadlines, flags missing exhibits, and integrates responses with your case timeline so nothing slips through the cracks. We are a law firm that uses technology strategically to meet litigation demands and counter insurance company tactics.
• Discovery playbooks: Our team uses tested checklists for RFAs in motor vehicle, product-related, premises, and catastrophic injury cases. The approach emphasizes authenticating key records early, narrowing issues before depositions, and preserving fee claims for failure to admit when appropriate.

What is our experience and track record?

• 30 years of combined experience: Our attorneys have worked across hundreds of personal injury matters in TX, CA, and IL, including complex, multi-party disputes.
• Over 1000 litigated cases: We have handled more than one thousand cases, with settlements and verdicts published on our site. Review representative results here: past cases.
• Complex litigation capabilities: In cases involving product liability, 18-wheeler crashes, brain injury, spinal injury, and other complex scenarios, we collaborate with independent, qualified professionals in the state to provide testimony needed to establish liability and damages.
• Multi-state litigation: We litigate severe injury and complex cases in Texas, California, and Illinois, coordinating local rules and deadlines for RFAs, depositions, and motions.
• Awards and recognition:

• #1 settlements and verdicts across multiple U.S. counties according to TopVerdict.
• Top 100 Settlement in Texas as reported by TopVerdict.
• Sean Chalaki honored as Top 40 Under 40 by National Trial Lawyers.
• Recognized by Best Lawyers in 2023, 2024, and 2025.
• Selected to Super Lawyers since 2021.

How are we different from volume firms?

• Focused caseloads: We are not a volume firm. We prioritize quality legal services and individualized attention. Your case strategy, including RFAs, is tailored to your facts and your goals.
• Hands-on litigation: When RFAs need to be served, answered, or withdrawn, we act fast. Our attorneys prepare, review, and argue discovery motions when necessary to protect your position.

Where are our nearest locations and how can we help immediately?

• Local presence: We serve clients across Texas, California, and Illinois, including Houston, Dallas, Austin, San Antonio, Los Angeles, San Diego, San Francisco, and Chicago. We can meet virtually or in person on short notice.
• 24/7 staffing: An attorney and staff are available at all locations around the clock to begin reviewing your RFAs, draft responses, and set a plan for depositions and motions.
• Immediate next steps: If you received RFAs, we can calculate your exact response deadline today, collect necessary records, prepare verified responses where required, and determine whether to pursue or oppose motions related to deemed admissions or expenses of proof.

From day one, we work to protect you from harmful deemed admissions, maximize the value of well-targeted RFAs, and position your case for effective negotiation or trial.

Sources and further reading

• Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 36, Requests for Admission: law.cornell.edu
• Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 37(c)(2), Expenses on Failure to Admit: law.cornell.edu
• Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a) and 26(g): law.cornell.edu
• Texas Rules of Civil Procedure, including Rules 192, 198, and 215: txcourts.gov
• California Code of Civil Procedure 2033.010 to 2033.420 (Requests for Admission): leginfo.legislature.ca.gov
• California Code of Civil Procedure 2033.030 (Numerical limits): leginfo.legislature.ca.gov
• California Code of Civil Procedure 2033.240, 2033.250, 2033.280, 2033.300, 2033.420: leginfo.legislature.ca.gov
• Illinois Supreme Court Rule 216 and Rule 219(b): illinoiscourts.gov
• United States Courts, Judicial Business 2023: uscourts.gov
• Bureau of Justice Statistics, Civil Bench and Jury Trials in State Courts: bjs.ojp.gov
• Cornell Legal Information Institute, Discovery overview: law.cornell.edu